Scientometrics Analysis of World-Wide Scientific Research Output on Treatment of Diabetes Using VOSviewer and R Biblioshiny Visualisation Tools

Authors

Keywords:

Diabetes treatment, Scientometric analysis, VOSviewer, R Biblioshiny, Collaboration networks, Global research trends

Abstract

This study conducts a scientometric analysis of global research on diabetes treatment from 2020 to 2024, It aims to examine the quantitative publication trends, identify prolific authors and core journals, map influential themes and scholarly networks, and visualize international collaboration patterns. Data were retrieved from the Scopus database using a comprehensive Boolean search string, refined by inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in 4,073 relevant documents. VOSviewer and Biblioshiny R were employed for advanced scientometric visualization and interpretation, including Thematic Map  co-authorship, co-occurrence, bibliographic coupling, and factorial analysis. The results indicate a steady increase in research output, with the highest relative growth rate is 0.792 in 2021, declining to 0.261 in 2024. Citation metrics showed that publications from 2020 had the highest impact of 17.53, while 2024 publications exhibited lower citation counts due to a shorter citation window. Co-occurrence analysis identified “type 2 diabetes,” “metformin,” and “glycemic control” as central keywords, reflecting thematic dominance in pharmacotherapy and complications. Thematic mapping revealed mature research areas (e.g., insulin therapy), niche topics (e.g., retinopathy), and emerging themes (e.g., diabetic foot ulcers). Co-authorship mapping identified Khunti K. and Ji Linong as key contributors, while Diabetes Care emerged as the most influential journal. Country collaboration networks showed the USA, China, and the UK as leading contributors, with the UK having the highest percentage of international collaboration of 48.7%.

Author Biographies

  • Mr. Samyak Pratik Pattanaik, Sambalpur University

    Library and Information Science Department

  • Dr. Bikram Kishore Beura, Sambalpur University

    Library and Information Science Department

References

American Diabetes Association. (2023). Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2023. Diabetes Care, 46(Suppl. 1), S1–S291. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc23-Sint

Aminabee, S., Karnati, S., Shankar, K. R., Devi, T. S., Srinivasu, P., & Harshini, G. (2024). Exploring diabetes research trends in india: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis using vosviewer. Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal, 17(3), 1655–1666. https://biomedpharmajournal.org/vol17no3/exploring-diabetes-research-trends-in-india-a-comprehensive-bibliometric-analysis-using-vosviewer/

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

International Diabetes Federation. (2021). IDF Diabetes Atlas (10th ed.). https://diabetesatlas.org

Mitu, L. G., Repanovici, A., & Pantea, I. (2024). Scientometric analysis of research trends in nano patches for insulin monitoring: Insights from web of science using vosviewer. 2024 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/EHB64556.2024.10805620

Pattanaik, S. P., & Beura, B. K. (2024). Visualising trends and patterns of three decades of research on millet production in India: A scientometrics analysis. International Journal of Advanced Research, 12(11), 685–694. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/19876

Shen, J., Chen, J., Feng, L., & Feng, C. (2022). A scientometrics analysis and visualisation of diabetic foot research from 1955 to 2022. International Wound Journal, 20(4), 1072–1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13964

Su, Z., Liu, L., Zhang, J., Guo, J., Wang, G., & Zeng, X. (2025). A scientometric visualization analysis of the gut microbiota and gestational diabetes mellitus. Frontiers in Microbiology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1485560

Sun, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., & Zhang, H. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of global research on gut microbiota and diabetes: Trends and hotspots. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 13, 920107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.920107

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Wang, H., Li, X., & Wu, Y. (2023). A scientometric analysis of diabetic erectile dysfunction research from 2001 to 2022. Andrology, 11(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13214

Wang, Q., Zhu, Q., & Li, N. (2023). A scientometric analysis and visualization of scientific research and technology innovation in needle-free insulin injection from 1974 to 2022. Clinical Therapeutics, 45(9), 881–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.06.025

Xu, R., Shao, X., Qiao, H., Yan, H., & Xue, Y. (2024). Research trends in the relationship between vitamin D and type 2 diabetes mellitus: A 20-year bibliometric and visualization analysis. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 15, 1421953. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1421953

Zhang, H., Chen, X., & Liu, Y. (2023). Research trends in diabetic retinopathy: A bibliometric and visual analysis. BMJ Open Ophthalmology, 8(1), e001012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001012

Downloads

Published

2026-03-10