Quantitative and Qualitative Methods applied in LIS research published in Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS): An Analysis
Keywords:
Research Methods; Quantitative analysis; Qualitative analysis; Content analysis.Abstract
The study examined 296 research articles published in the Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS) during 2011 to 2020 to identify trends in Library and Information Science (LIS) research, focusing on the research methods used. The research finds Bibliometrics and Scientometrics emerged as the dominant areas of study. Bibliometrics and Surveys of various types were the most used research methods with Web of Knowledge and Scopus being the preferred data sources to ensure reliability for their findings. Questionnaires and Likert scales were frequently used for data collection, with purposive and random sampling as the primary selection methods. Statistical data analysis often involved frequency counts and simple percentage analysis, followed by descriptive and inferential statistics. MS Excel and SPSS were the preferred software/tools for data analysis. Citation analysis revealed that journals were the most cited sources, particularly Scientometrics and Annals of Library and Information Studies. The findings provide a comprehensive overview of the methodologies and trends within LIS research.
References
References:
1. Chu, H. (2015). Research methods in library and information science: A content analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 37(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.09.003
2. Zhang, J., Zhao, Y., & Wang, Y. (2016). A study on statistical methods used in six journals of library and information science. Online Information Review, 40(3), 416–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-07-2015-0247
3. Ullah, A., & Ameen, K. (2022). Statistical analysis used in LIS research produced by Pakistani authors. Online Information Review, 46(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-02-2021-0092
4. Togia, A., Malliari, A., Togia, A., & Malliari, A. (2017). Research Methods in Library and Information Science. In Qualitative versus Quantitative Research. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68749
5. Fidel, R. (2008). Are we there yet?: Mixed methods research in library and information science. Library & Information Science Research, 30(4), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2008.04.001
6. Hider, P., & Pymm, B. (2008). Empirical research methods reported in high-profile LIS journal literature. Library & Information Science Research, 30(2), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2007.11.007
7. Pandey, P., Madhusudhan, M., & Singh, B. P. (2023). Quantitative Research Approach and its Applications in Library and Information Science Research. Access: An International Journal of Nepal Library Association, 2(01), Article 01. https://doi.org/10.3126/access.v2i01.58895
8. Bilgin, Y. (2017). Qualitative Method Versus Quantitative Method in Marketing Research: An Application Example at Oba Restaurant. In Qualitative versus Quantitative Research. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/67848
9. Zhang, J., Wang, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2017). Investigation on the statistical methods in research studies of library and information science. The Electronic Library, 35(6), 1070–1086. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-02-2016-0042
10. Ibrahim, B. (2021). Statistical methods used in Arabic journals of library and information science. Scientometrics, 126(5), 4383–4416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03913-2
11. Chu, H., & Ke, Q. (2017). Research methods: What’s in the name? Library & Information Science Research, 39(4), 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.11.001
12. Ma, J., & Lund, B. (2021). The evolution and shift of research topics and methods in library and information science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(8), 1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24474
13. Järvelin, K., & Vakkari, P. (2022). LIS research across 50 years: Content analysis of journal articles. Journal of Documentation, 78(7), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2021-0062
14. White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content Analysis: A Flexible Methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22–45.
15. Koufogiannakis, D., Slater, L., & Crumley, E. (2004). A Content Analysis of Librarianship Research. Journal of Information Science, 30(3), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551504044668
16. Maharana, B., Nayak, K., & Sahu, N. K. (2006). Scholarly use of web resources in LIS research: A citation analysis. Library Review, 55(9), 598–607. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242530610706789
17. Jena, K. L, Swain, D. K., & Bihari Sahu, S. (2012). Scholarly communication of The Electronic Library from 2003‐2009: A bibliometric study. The Electronic Library, 30(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471211204097
18. Ke, Q., & Cheng, Y. (2015). Applications of meta-analysis to library and information science research: Content analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 37(4), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2015.05.004
19. Connaway, L. S., & Radford, M. L. (2016). Research Methods in Library and Information Science. Bloomsbury Academic.
20. Kothari, C. R., & Garg, G. (2019). Research Methodology (Fourth edition). New Age International Publishers.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
