Growth of Psychology and Clinical Psychology Literature: A Comparative Analysis of India, World and European Countries

Authors

Abstract

The present study compares the literature in the disciplines of psychology and clinical psychology from India, the World, and European countries between 1989 and 2023, looking at the expansion of these fields as per the data of the Web of Science.  To examine the growth and trend of the literature, various growth models were applied to the dataset from the defined countries and the data was analyzed using MS Excel. Overall an increasing trend of production is seen from all three of them, the maximum papers have been produced during the block 2019-2023 and the minimum during 1989-1993. An increasing trend in Relative Growth Rate is seen among which the world’s mean RGR is the highest in both fields i.e., 0.990 and 0.964 in psychology and clinical psychology respectively. The psychology & clinical psychology literature from all defined countries shows a decreasing trend of Dt values over the period. The curve fitting statistics show that except for the literature from European nations which best suit the linear growth model, the others i.e., the world and India show that the exponential growth model fits best to the Psychology literature. On the other hand, clinical psychology literature from the World, European nations, and India shows that it best fits the exponential growth statistics. The chi-square test statistics show that the European countries clinical psychology literature follows the logarithmic model and the Indian Psychology literature follows the Linear growth Model as the calculated chi-square values are -95782.4 and -913.53 respectively, which are less than the theoretical chi-square values. Except for these two, none of the datasets follows any growth models when tested through chi-square analysis.

References

1. Azad, Y. P. (2021). History, current status and recent advances in the field of psychology: a literature review. In Psychology: Living imprints everywhere (pp. 23–30). National Press Associates. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353347395_HISTORY_CURRENT_STATUS_AND_RECENT_ADVANCES_IN_THE_FIELD_OF_PSYCHOLOGY_A_LITERATURE_REVIEW

2. Thangaraju T Sivakumar, P. (2018). Evolution of Psychology in India. Journal of Abnormal and Behavioral Psychology, 7(6), 155. https://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/evolution-of-psychology-in-india.pdf

3. Lunt, I. (2001). Clinical Psychology in Europe, History of. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 873–876). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.03026-9

5. El-Shorbagy, M., & El-Refaey, A. M. (2022). COVID-19: Mathematical growth vs. precautionary measures in China, KSA, and the USA. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 28, 100834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2021.100834

6. Jozi, Z., & Nourmohammadi, H. (2022). Scientometrics analysis of world scientific research of pathology and forensic medicine. Iranian Journal of Pathology, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.30699/ijp.2022.541660.2756

7. Singh, K. P., & Verma, S. (2021). Modeling the growth of food science and technology literature in India. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-12. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/modeling-growth-food-science-technology/docview/2492708613/se-2

8. Elangovan, N. (2020). Application of growth models to research literature of all India Institute of Medical Sciences. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 40(03), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.40.03.14876

9. Neelamma, G. & Anandhalli, G. (2020). Modelling the growth of literature in the area of crystallography. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 3813. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/3813

10. Nayak, S. N., & Bankapur, V. M. (2017). Modelling the growth of global agricultural literature: A scienometric study based on CAB-Abstracts. International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 7(3). http://www.ijlis.org

11. Hadagali, G. & Anandhalli, G. (2015). Modeling the growth of neurology literature. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice. 3. 45-63. 10.1633/JISTaP.2015.3.3.3.

12. Sangam, S.L., Madalli, D. & Arali, U.B. (2015). Scientometrics profile of global genetics literature as seen through PubMed. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 9(2), 175-192. DOI: 10.1080/09737766.2015.1069956

13. Sharma, P., Gupta, B.M. & Kumar, S. (2002). Application of growth models to science and technology literature in research specialties. DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology. 22. 10.14429/dbit.22.2.3560.

14. Shilpa, B., & Padmamma, S. (2020). Scientometrics observations of authorship pattern and collaborative research on leukemia. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 10(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-5576.2020.00008.4

15. Mahapatra, M. (1985). On the validity of the theory of exponential growth of scientific literature. In Proceedings of the 15th IASLIC Conference, Bangalore, 61-70.

16. Rao, I. K. R. (2010). Growth of literature and measures of scientific productivity: Scientometric models. Ess Ess Publications.

17. Pooja, & Meera. (2024). Modelling the growth of Indo-US collaborated literature in the field of bioinformatics. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 13(1), 99–124. https://www.qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/827/743

Downloads

Published

2025-09-05